Comparing Speeches of Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez :: Communication Leadership

Both of the speeches, Martin Luther Kings and Cesar C givez, are powerful peices and communicate one pot equality. King and Chavez have two very different tendencys of writing provided the message from both is simmilar. for example both king and chavez discuss how their mass are discriminated against because of their skin color, and how their nation have neither the right to vote in the the south, nor the will to vote in the north , and in Chavez situation, to have their vote counted. however similar their messages may be, their writing styles are different. Chavez negotiation about statistics, about why and how his people are treated. king held that the atrocitys commited against his people were self evident and as such did not need to be proved to anyone. kings message was meant to encompass the entire Uninted States while Chavez was directed earlier at California.Throught the history of the uninted states it has been plagued with racism and prejudice. M.L.K and C.C were the two most outspoken opponents to the injury that they saw on a daily basis. mlk said that it was time to rise up our nation from the quick sands of racial injustice to the solid stone of brotherhood. both ceasar and martin recognized a need for change and were weather enough to seek change. indeed in 1968 Dr. King sent a message to Chavez which said Our separate peels are really one. A struggle for freedom, for dignity, and for humanity. These mens cause was one and the same. these men were intamently connected, in fact chavez said that they were Dr. Kings disciples. you could no more have chavez without king than you could have ghandi without the imperialism. both men tangle that their people were being robbed of there dignity. cesar chavez said that the most important amour to him was the recognition of workers dignity. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating For Whites further. was how m lk stated their dissatisfaction with the inequality.Even though their message was incredibly similar, their writing style was vastly different. for example, Chavez talked in a especially concrete sense. he gave item examples and statistics to support his opinion wihle mlk spoke on a very exalted level with no real support in his speech. this difference mogul be because of there different backgrounds.