Manipulation of Truth in Oliver Stones JFK Essay -- essays research p

Manipulation of the true in Oliver collierys JFKOliver tilt is a master of manipulation. Being an expert in the prowess of directing, Stone is able to work an consultation hope whatsoever he wishes. In the 1991 enter JFK, Oliver Stone manipulates facts in order to ext closing curtain a fictional conspiracy involving the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The Zapruder film and the invocation bullet theory are two facts that Stone employs to trick the audience into believing his fabricated tale.Stone unfolds this film through the eyes of Jim Garrison, the territorial dominion attorney of New Orleans, who believes that there is more to the assassination than what has been presented in the past. Although three years have gone by since the certainty of the trial, Garrison feels personally obligated to uncover classified information that will prove a complex government coup detat. Garrisons idea that the United States government is someways related to Kennedys assassinatio n is first seen in the opening of the film. Stone flashes scenes from the Zapruder film (an eight millimeter live video of the shooting) where he mutes the original audio sounds and replaces them with ceremonial music, representative of the United States government. Being that the Zapruder film is a contribution of documented evidence a general audience does non psyche its validity. This replacement of sound is a conscious attempt to foreshadow the conclusion that Stone wants the audience to come to at the end of the film. By linking unneurotic visual images of the assassination with military music, Stone sends a subliminal message that two are somehow related. In reality, this connection is nothing more than a fictional interpretation contrived by Oliver Stone. Where does reality end and fiction begin in Garrisons conspiracy theory? This is a brain that one must ask themselves before viewing the final result of JFK. The final element of the movie is made up of an intense an d capture courtroom scene. It is here where Garrison culminates the entirety of his speculations and presents them in front of a court of law. Are Garrisons suppositions valid, or is it the way in which he presents these conjectures that makes them pop out to be true? Garrisons passionate and charismatic rhetoric makes his accusations exce... ... righteousness in the name of their former president. Testimonies from witness present at the assassination, in reality, do not exist. Because of the emotional high being experienced, viewing audience do not take the time to separate what is fact in Garrisons testimony from what is fiction. Stone successfully uses his final presentation of the factual Zapruder film to coerce a majority of both audiences into believing his contrived tale. Oliver Stone incorporates facts much(prenominal) as the Zapruder film and the magic bullet theory into his 1991 film, JFK. This film is not mean to be a documentary, but rater a persuasive work of art that uses facts in order to convey fiction. Being a master of manipulation, Stone is able to alter the way in which he presents these facts, causing viewers to believe that there is a conspiracy involving the Kennedy assassination. By using techniques such as replacement of sound and repetition of footage, Oliver Stone forces viewers to make false connections and experience intense emotions. Through careful manipulation of evidence in JFK, Stone successfully persuades a majority of viewers to believe an ultimately fictional conspiracy.