Trump’s Foreign Policy Agenda on North Korea

outstrips Foreign form _or_ system of government agendum on northeasterly KoreaWhich administration cabinet officer support extraneous constitution on northeastern Korea ?Secretary of Defense mob Mattis has supported The hot seat in negotiations with pairing Korea. Mattis has been against troops exercise against north state of wards Korea. However, Mattis is actu attendant aware of the danger that normality Korea is posing to the join States. This terror has been steadily growing and Secretary of Defense Mattis believes that northwestern Korea has accelerated the threat that it poses to its neighbors and the gentleman through its illegal and unnecessary missile and nuclear weapons programs.6 Mattis has maintained alliances and tended to(p) meetings with leading and representatives of nations that are allies of the US in sanctify to fork out pressure from all sides in order to deter and control due north Koreas nuclear proliferation. Secretary of State Rex Till erson has as well been closely problematic in the creation of foreign policy on North Korea. Tillersons mentality towards North Korea is very similar to that of Secretary of Defense Mattis. Tillerson believes that negotiations towards calm can only be achieved by denuclearizing, giving up their weapons of trade destruction.7 Both cabinet members have played key roles in the Trump administration on the topic of North Korean foreign policy.Was the sex act heavily twisting? social intercourse has non been heavily involved in North Korean foreign policy. Under President Obamas term, Congress had passed sanctions. But under President Trumps term, Congress has not been involved with foreign policy on North Korea. It has been handled so removed only by the president in the form of executive orders, on with the council of his cabinet members, mainly Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense James Mattis. Which interest groups were involved?The two big interest group s in this location are Russia and China. Both countries have supplied aid to North Korea in order to keep it in power, but for different flat coats. China has supported North Korea for so long in order to keep a soften partition off between them and South Korea, a United States ally. China does not want the US at their border and bequeath keep bread and butter North Korea as long as the trade-off of goods for this buffer zone is worth it. Russia has also been supplying North Korea with resources for m whatever years, but the reason it is doing so is that it wants to reassert itself as a global power. Russia wants to extend its fix outside of Europe and into the Asian Pacific. Both nations seek to gain something from the excerpt and future growth of North Korea as a key doer in the piece. South Korea is the biggest interest group, with North Korea being right above them. If North Korea launched an flak, South Korea would be the first and most likely target area of said a ttack. They will be the first affected by any change in North Korea, for better or worse. The United States also has interests in the region. South Korea has US armament bases and is a key ally in the region. If North Korea attacked the south, it would destabilize the region and pose an immediate threat to US interests. If North Korea breachped its production of nuclear weapons and stopped do tests, it would lower tensions and allow the US to comfortably remain in the region in order to ensure democratic control of the region.The History of North Korean policyThe United States policy on North Korea begins with the Korean war. This war began in June 1950 and came to an end in July 1953. This war came to fruition when North Korean leader Kim il-Sung successfully convinced Soviet leader Joseph Stalin that the quantify had come to launch an intrusion of South Korea. On June 25, 1950, the north had begun an attack by striking across the thirty-eighth parallel into the south. In sol ution to this attack, President Truman decided not to seek a declaration of war from Congress, believing that it would be an overreaction. Immediate action was motiveed and Truman decided to go directly to the United Nations. He requested sanctions against North Korea, and Under U.S. guidance, the UN called for the invasion to halt (June 25), then for the UN member states to provide military assistance to the ROK (June 27). 1 However, this did not stop the fighting and did not keep the North from killing those who protested against them. erst the United States began to back South Korea with troops, they managed to push them back past tense the thirty-eighth parallel until China began to send reinforcements. Soon, a stalemate was reached at the 38th parallel. In July 1953, an armistice was reached but the war was not declared officially over. Future sanctions against North Korea first came from the United Nations. These sanctions began after North Korea displayed its aptitude fo r the creation of nuclear weaponry with its first nuclear test in 2006. The first sanctions came from resolution 1718, which prevents a range of goods from entering or expiration the Democratic Peoples majority rule of Korea and imposes an asset freeze and operate ban on persons related to the nuclear-weapon programme.2 The latest sanctions to come from the UN were passed on kinsfolk 11, 2017, with resolution 2375. These sanctions limited North Koreas trades including a ban on the trade of natural gas liquids to the North-East Asian nation, and on its textile exports small-arm also prohibiting Member States from providing work authorizations to its nationals.3 However, North Korea has continually ignored these sanctions and go on to have a nuclear weapons program. The United States has also enacted sanctions against North Korea, commencement in 2016 with President Obama. The proposed sanctions passed some(prenominal) the house and senate. The sanctions Imposed mandatory s anctions for entities that are involved in North Koreas mineral or metal trade, which stomach to a large component of the soils foreign export earnings.4 The most recent sanctions have come from President Trump on September 25, 2017, which were enacted as executive orders. The executive order expanded his disputed travel ban to include people from North Korea, Venezuela and Chad, citing security concerns.5 However, notwithstanding these actions, North Korea has not been deterred from continuing its developments of Nuclear weapons.Evaluation of the foreign policy on North KoreaThe United States foreign policy on North Korea has been focused on sanctions that will put a strain on both(prenominal) their economy and the progression of their nuclear program. These sanctions have limited both their imports and exports so that they may not purchase resources nor make money by selling the goods that they do have, such as natural gas. These sanctions have been ineffective, no matter how restrictive they have been, collectible to their allies supplying them with the resources that they need to maintain power. Further sanctions will prove to be fruitless if this paying back is not solved, and it may be best to find another instruction to limit their production of nuclear arms. However, this will not be contingent if North Korea is pushed to the point where it will attack. In the past few months, the president has been threatening military action towards North Korea if they do not stop testing ICBMs. President Trump has posted a tweet on the matter, stating that Our country has been unsuccessfully dealing with North Korea for 25 years, giving billions of dollars & getting nothing. Policy didnt work8 The growing threat of North Korea is a number of its recent successful missile tests. This success paired with the ineffectiveness of past sanctions is pushing The United States towards considering a preemptive strike on North Korea, especially if negotiations break down further. ConclusionsMilitary action is not necessary in order to resolve the threat that North Korea is posing on the UnitedStates and its allies. Sanctions have proved to be ineffective towardsdeterring them from continuing a nuclear weapons program, but perhaps adifferent course of action could be taken to progress these talks. It would bebest to refrain from escalating the smudge by remaining quiet and not speakabout military action, which may be what they want because that would allowthem to justify the existence of their program. A neutral party may benecessary to provide a medium for communications between the United States andNorth Korea. The two leaders would not be able to speak and negotiate publiclydue to the ramifications of doing so. North Korea would begin to lose supportfrom their allies, Russia and China. The United States also could not hold publicnegotiations due to their classification of North Korea as a sponsor ofterrorism. Negotiating with North Korea ma y give the impression that the USwill negotiate with terrorists. This part of the problem can be solved bydeclassifying them as a sponsor of terror. This would ease tensions slightlyand may even open a small path for diplomacy. A party that is both familiarwith and impartial towards the United States and North Korea would ease theprogression of diplomacy. This would be the way to de-escalate the situation inNorth Korea and avoid military action that would lead to a second Korean war,which is what forced these tensions to be created in the first place.Works CitedMillett, Allan R. Korean War. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encyclopdia Britannica, inc, 17 July 2017. Accessed 2 Dec. 2017.SECURITY COUNCIL CONDEMNS NUCLEAR TEST BY DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES commonwealth OF KOREA, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1718 (2006). United Nations, United Nations, 14 Oct. 2006, www.un.org/press/en/2006/sc8853.doc.htm. Accessed 2 Dec. 2017.Security Council Imposes Fresh Sanctions on Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, Including Bans on Natural Gas Sales, Work Authorization for Its Nationals. United Nations, United Nations, 11 Sept. 2017, www.un.org/press/en/2017/sc12983.doc.htm. Accessed 2 Dec. 2017.Fifield, Anna. Punishing North Korea A rundown on current sanctions. The Washington Post, The Washington Post, 22 Feb. 2016. Accessed 4 Dec. 2017.US expands travel ban to include N Korea. BBC, BBC, 25 Sept. 2017, www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41382585. Accessed 4 Dec. 2017Manchester, Julia. Mattis North Korea threat has accelerated. The Hill, The Hill, 28 Oct. 2017. Accessed 5 Dec. 2017Sanger, David E. Rex Tillerson Rejects Talks With North Korea on Nuclear Program. The New York Times, The New York Times, 17 Mar. 2017. Accessed 6 Dec. 2017.Trump, Donald J. (realDonaldTrump) Our country has been unsuccessfully dealing with North Korea for 25 years, giving billions of dollars & getting nothing. Policy didnt work 9 Oct. 2017, 350 AM, Tweet